U.S. v. Johnson, 194 F.3d 657 (5th Cir. 1999)
Johnson burned down a church, pled guilty, then challenged the conviction on the grounds that the jurisdictional element (interstate commerce) wasn't met. Judge Benavides, citing Rea and Robinson, with no analysis, said that the JE was not a prerequisite to SMJ, but merely an element of the offense.
References
US v. Rea, 169 F.3d 1111 (8th Cir. 1999)
US v. Robinson, 119 F.3d 1205 (5th Cir. 1997)
Citing references
US v. Reasor, 418 F.3d 466 (5th Cir. 2005)
US v. Nukida, 8 F.3d 665 (9th Cir. 1993)
US v. Barone, 71 F.3d 1442 (9th Cir. 1995)
U.S. v. Bustos-Useche, 273 F.3d 622 (5th Cir. 2001)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(44)
-
▼
March
(21)
- Ascertaining the Laws of the Several State: Positi...
- Reconstructing Erie: A Comment on The Perils of Le...
- US v. Johnson
- The Jurisdictional Label: Use and Misuse
- The Federalist #80
- The Federalist #51
- In Search of Removal Jurisdiction
- Sad Time: Thoughts on Jurisdictionality, the Legal...
- The Failure of Bowles v. Russell
- Jurisdiction, Merits, and Procedure: Thoughts on D...
- The Dubious Concept of Jurisdiction
- Is Citizen Suit Notice Jurisdictional and Why Does...
- Bowles v. Russell
- Jurisdictionality and Bowles v. Russell
- Misguided Federalism
- All About Words: Early Understandings of the "Judi...
- Abstention and the Constitutional Limits of the Ju...
- "Arising Under" Jurisdiction in the Federalism Ren...
- More Than a Legal Nicety: Why the Forum Defendant ...
- Insufficiently Jurisdictional: The Case Against Tr...
- Executing the Treaty Power
-
▼
March
(21)
No comments:
Post a Comment