Calvin R. Massey, Abstention and the Constitutional Limits of the Judicial Power of the United States, 1991 B.Y.U. L. Rev. 811 (1991)
Argues that the abstention doctrines are really the Court enforcing the concept of dual sovereignty (i.e. federalism) on itself. This supports my position to the extent that I need to show that the Court does need to consider federalism when it acts, i.e. that federalism ain't just for Congress.
Citing references
Ann Woolhandler & Michael G. Collins, Judicial Federalism and the Administrative States, 87 Cal. L. Rev. 613 (1999)
Bradford C. Clark, Ascertaining the Laws of the Several States: Positivism and Judicial Federalism After Erie, 145 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1459 (1997)
Monday, March 3, 2008
Abstention and the Constitutional Limits of the Judicial Power of the United States
Labels:
abstention,
art1art3,
federalism,
judicial federalism
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(44)
-
▼
March
(21)
- Ascertaining the Laws of the Several State: Positi...
- Reconstructing Erie: A Comment on The Perils of Le...
- US v. Johnson
- The Jurisdictional Label: Use and Misuse
- The Federalist #80
- The Federalist #51
- In Search of Removal Jurisdiction
- Sad Time: Thoughts on Jurisdictionality, the Legal...
- The Failure of Bowles v. Russell
- Jurisdiction, Merits, and Procedure: Thoughts on D...
- The Dubious Concept of Jurisdiction
- Is Citizen Suit Notice Jurisdictional and Why Does...
- Bowles v. Russell
- Jurisdictionality and Bowles v. Russell
- Misguided Federalism
- All About Words: Early Understandings of the "Judi...
- Abstention and the Constitutional Limits of the Ju...
- "Arising Under" Jurisdiction in the Federalism Ren...
- More Than a Legal Nicety: Why the Forum Defendant ...
- Insufficiently Jurisdictional: The Case Against Tr...
- Executing the Treaty Power
-
▼
March
(21)
No comments:
Post a Comment