Brian W. Portugal, Note, More Than a Legal Nicety: Why the Forum Defendant Rule of 28 U.S.C. Section 1441(b) is Jurisdictional, 56 Baylor L. Rev. 1019 (2004)
Points out that SMJ is a constitutionally based doctrine, but then only performs a statutory interpretation analysis to determine whether the forum defendant rule should be considered constitutional. It thus isn't that interesting for me except as an example of "yet another jurisdictionality paper".
(Cited in a petition for a writ of cert. in a forum defendant case! (Writ denied.))
Monday, March 3, 2008
More Than a Legal Nicety: Why the Forum Defendant Rule of 28 U.S.C. Section 1441(b) is Jurisdictional
Labels:
art1art3,
subject matter jurisdiction
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(44)
-
▼
March
(21)
- Ascertaining the Laws of the Several State: Positi...
- Reconstructing Erie: A Comment on The Perils of Le...
- US v. Johnson
- The Jurisdictional Label: Use and Misuse
- The Federalist #80
- The Federalist #51
- In Search of Removal Jurisdiction
- Sad Time: Thoughts on Jurisdictionality, the Legal...
- The Failure of Bowles v. Russell
- Jurisdiction, Merits, and Procedure: Thoughts on D...
- The Dubious Concept of Jurisdiction
- Is Citizen Suit Notice Jurisdictional and Why Does...
- Bowles v. Russell
- Jurisdictionality and Bowles v. Russell
- Misguided Federalism
- All About Words: Early Understandings of the "Judi...
- Abstention and the Constitutional Limits of the Ju...
- "Arising Under" Jurisdiction in the Federalism Ren...
- More Than a Legal Nicety: Why the Forum Defendant ...
- Insufficiently Jurisdictional: The Case Against Tr...
- Executing the Treaty Power
-
▼
March
(21)
No comments:
Post a Comment