Scott Dodson, Jurisdictionality and Bowles v. Russell, 102 Nw. U. L. Colloqy 42 (2007)
Just basically a note on Bowles v. Russell, which holds that time limits are jurisdictional. It's a preposterous decision, 5-4, conservatives over liberals, but it utterly ignores Arbaugh.
That said, this article isn't really relevant to me now. The case might be as an example of how even Arbaugh, with its categorical rule, hasn't actually settled these questions, that there might be more room for debate on these issues.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(44)
-
▼
March
(21)
- Ascertaining the Laws of the Several State: Positi...
- Reconstructing Erie: A Comment on The Perils of Le...
- US v. Johnson
- The Jurisdictional Label: Use and Misuse
- The Federalist #80
- The Federalist #51
- In Search of Removal Jurisdiction
- Sad Time: Thoughts on Jurisdictionality, the Legal...
- The Failure of Bowles v. Russell
- Jurisdiction, Merits, and Procedure: Thoughts on D...
- The Dubious Concept of Jurisdiction
- Is Citizen Suit Notice Jurisdictional and Why Does...
- Bowles v. Russell
- Jurisdictionality and Bowles v. Russell
- Misguided Federalism
- All About Words: Early Understandings of the "Judi...
- Abstention and the Constitutional Limits of the Ju...
- "Arising Under" Jurisdiction in the Federalism Ren...
- More Than a Legal Nicety: Why the Forum Defendant ...
- Insufficiently Jurisdictional: The Case Against Tr...
- Executing the Treaty Power
-
▼
March
(21)
No comments:
Post a Comment